3 comments

  1. Shell occasionally comes under fire for their lack of environmental practices, so what they should be doing is what Greenpeace etc. recommends by consciously making an effort to make their oil less damaging on the environment as well as creating/donating to an organization that helps wildlife.

    1. I agree Shell should be focused on doing less damage to the environment and they might should listen to the Greenpeace people, but Twitter states impersonation is wrong and Greenpeace and who all is with them could be doing more damage here.

      -LG

  2. Good post. I think this opens up a bigger issues that companies will likely face at some point and time. No matter what decisions are made, there is a good chance that somebody is going offended. The difference is going to be how that situation is dealt with.

Share your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s